Page 7 of 59 FirstFirst ... 567891757 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 175 of 1461

Thread: Fuel Economy

  1. #151
    Jr Member Electra-fire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    284
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Replying to Topic \'Fuel Economy\'

    haha ya I\'m in the 2.0..
    BUT for those who own the 2.0 I\'m going to start recording if you want to do a comparison
    I usually drive with AC off, and 120 to 140 for speed on the highway...
    But I also want to see if AC really does effect my gas that much with it on.
    ~M5 Lightin It Up~
    Stock for now :[ D'oh

    Soon to get!!!
    20% Tint, Rear Spoiler !
    ANYTHING TO NOT MAKE IT LOOK LIKE A VAN!!!

  2. #152
    Jr Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    573
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Replying to Topic \'Fuel Economy\'

    Originally posted by majic


    Originally posted by Titanium_M3GT


    A/C off and windows down most of the time. If I use the A/C I will get approx 500KM/tank. I dont understand the difference in fuel economy, my car is a Dec. 04 production date. What production date is everyone elses? I think Electra_fire gets better gas mileage than I do...I would be curious to know the production date on that car as well.
    well AC should be better on the highway due to the drag caused by open windows. and when you\'re stuck in traffic the AC uses up a lot more juice.. also.. electra fire has a 2.0L model so the comparison isn\'t valid.. and finally the sedan weighs about 30kg less than the sport as well as has a lower coefficient of drag (0.332 vs 0.346 - 17\" wheel models)
    something I find I do in the name of economy is turn of the a/c when accelerating (say from a stop light) and turn it back on when I\'m coasting. I avoid traffic so it\'s not too much but I wonder if it hurts the car?

  3. #153
    Sr Member Flagrum_3's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Scarborough
    Posts
    6,355
    Thanks
    345
    Thanked 382 Times in 307 Posts
    Mentioned
    108 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Replying to Topic \'Fuel Economy\'

    Originally posted by Optimzer


    Originally posted by majic


    Originally posted by Titanium_M3GT


    A/C off and windows down most of the time. If I use the A/C I will get approx 500KM/tank. I dont understand the difference in fuel economy, my car is a Dec. 04 production date. What production date is everyone elses? I think Electra_fire gets better gas mileage than I do...I would be curious to know the production date on that car as well.
    well AC should be better on the highway due to the drag caused by open windows. and when you\'re stuck in traffic the AC uses up a lot more juice.. also.. electra fire has a 2.0L model so the comparison isn\'t valid.. and finally the sedan weighs about 30kg less than the sport as well as has a lower coefficient of drag (0.332 vs 0.346 - 17\" wheel models)
    something I find I do in the name of economy is turn of the a/c when accelerating (say from a stop light) and turn it back on when I\'m coasting. I avoid traffic so it\'s not too much but I wonder if it hurts the car?
    Just a friendly warning....keep doing that and you\'ll be looking at getting new parts soon.


    _3


    .

  4. #154
    Jr Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    573
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Replying to Topic \'Fuel Economy\'

    won\'t be doing that anymore! thanks for the heads-up

    it was pretty hot today so the a/c was on the whole time.

  5. #155
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Age
    55
    Posts
    2,253
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Replying to Topic \'Fuel Economy\'

    I am almost done a full tank of gas. I am @ 367km on the trip!!! How is that for CR*P fuel economy!!!!!!!!!

    but... Do you think it has something to do with the AEM C.A.I installed 2 weeks ago? She really roars sweet at 100km/hr in Third Even at 140km/hr in fourth if ya give some gas she screams in extasy... Yum....

    OK.. I guess it is my bad driving habits that give me the garbage fuel economy...

    p.s Third gear only takes ya up to 140km/hr... baby has some pep I tell ya

  6. #156
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    178
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Replying to Topic \'Fuel Economy\'

    Okay, boys and girls. I tend to be a little anal about documenting my fuel economy in my Mazda3.



    As shown in the chart above, I am averaging the following:

    10.377 L/100km
    22.953 MPG (US)
    27.565 MPG (UK)
    536.697 km (theoretical range till every single 55-litre is used)

    The last entry, June 9th has been my 3rd worst hit. I have to mention that the previous 3-fill ups where at Shell gas stations, and the last one at Sunoco. Maybe the amount of fuel dispensed isn\'t calibrated so Sunoco is off by a few litres, thus giving me the sh*tty 11.826 L/100km (19.889 MPG)figure? I dunno, all I know is that I am a little disappointed in my overall average, which I expecting to drop below 10.0 L/100km.

    Oh yes, in the past 7-months or so, I\'ve also spent $1,054.19 CDN in fuel for this Mazda. Mind you, I haven\'t driven it that many km\'s to begin with. I believe my odometer is at 14,000 km.

    Cheers,

    PiCASSO

  7. #157
    Jr Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    573
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Replying to Topic \'Fuel Economy\'

    wow that\'s detailed - being an engineer...I like!!

    just a thought - I\'m not sure how you do your average b/c I don\'t have your spreadsheet file...but I\'m assuming that you\'re taking the average of each of your economy readings. However, as majic posted earlier, to get a more accurate posting, that doesn\'t give you the most accurate figure (you\'re taking an average of averages).

    Try calculating the average by summing up all the litres of fuel you\'ve used and dividing by the total number of kilometers driven. This will, if anything, give you a more accurate average...

    ie - (1000L / 14000km) * 100 = 7.14L / 100km

    nice work though.

  8. #158
    Jr Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    573
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Replying to Topic \'Fuel E

    just to add to that...your economy does seem pretty crappy. you have quite a few high figures too - do you think those are outliers that aren\'t accurate or something happened? I haven\'t driven enough to speak about mine so I\'m waiting to see how it will turn out...

    but what\'s your driving style? shiftpoints? a/c use? etc...

  9. #159
    Noob
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    12
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Replying to Topic \'Fuel Economy\'

    Alright... I\'ve read through most of this thread and I still can\'t tell whether my car gets good/bad mileage... most people seem to be talking about the GT?

    On my 2004 Sport GS the gas light comes on around 400 kms, so I\'d assume I get about 500km per tank? I do about 70% city, 30% highway and nearly the exact same mileage every week... seems to me I should be getting more out of one tank? (The car has 12400 kms on it).

    Also someone suggested changing brands of gas... could that really help?


    Nerdy_Grrl

  10. #160
    Sr Member majic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    8,684
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Replying to Topic \'Fuel Economy\'

    Originally posted by Optimzer


    wow that\'s detailed - being an engineer...I like!!
    then you\'ll like this too



    green - anything below 8.5L/100
    pink (red was too bright :p ) - anything over 10L/100
    at the top in blue overall averages

    for the penny pinchers and tree huggers :p after 13898km I spent $958.69 - so 1L/100km difference will save you 100bux over ~14000km (compared to PiCASSO\'s numbers)

    also, i\'ve been keeping my eye on when the light comes on and then how much i can fill and i\'ve averaged 11.53L of \'reserve fuel\'

    just to rehash:

    if ( mood == pissed off || ricer_revving == true || onramp_ahead == true){
    shift(5000, 6750);
    }else{
    shift(2000, 3000);
    }

    if (temp == unbearable && (speed > 60 || rain == true)){
    AC = ON;
    windows = UP;
    }else{
    AC = OFF;
    windows = DOWN;
    }

    Originally posted by nerdy_grrl_t


    Alright... I\'ve read through most of this thread and I still can\'t tell whether my car gets good/bad mileage... most people seem to be talking about the GT?

    On my 2004 Sport GS the gas light comes on around 400 kms, so I\'d assume I get about 500km per tank? I do about 70% city, 30% highway and nearly the exact same mileage every week... seems to me I should be getting more out of one tank? (The car has 12400 kms on it).

    Also someone suggested changing brands of gas... could that really help?


    Nerdy_Grrl
    with a GS you should be in the 8s.. or at least most of the ppl on TM3 are getting those numbers.. looks like the 2.0L engine is closer to its advertised ratings.

  11. #161
    Jr Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    573
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Replying to Topic \'Fuel Economy\'

    Originally posted by majic

    if ( mood == pissed off || ricer_revving == true || onramp_ahead == true){
    shift(5000, 6750);
    }else{
    shift(2000, 3000);
    }

    if (temp == unbearable && (speed > 60 || rain == true)){
    AC = ON;
    windows = UP;
    }else{
    AC = OFF;
    windows = DOWN;
    }
    hahahahaa - oh man that gave me a good laugh!

  12. #162
    Noob
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    30
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Replying to Topic \'Fuel Economy\'

    Originally posted by PiCASSO


    Okay, boys and girls. I tend to be a little anal about documenting my fuel economy in my Mazda3.

    As shown in the chart above, I am averaging the following:

    10.377 L/100km
    22.953 MPG (US)
    27.565 MPG (UK)
    536.697 km (theoretical range till every single 55-litre is used)

    The last entry, June 9th has been my 3rd worst hit. I have to mention that the previous 3-fill ups where at Shell gas stations, and the last one at Sunoco. Maybe the amount of fuel dispensed isn\'t calibrated so Sunoco is off by a few litres, thus giving me the sh*tty 11.826 L/100km (19.889 MPG)figure? I dunno, all I know is that I am a little disappointed in my overall average, which I expecting to drop below 10.0 L/100km.

    Oh yes, in the past 7-months or so, I\'ve also spent $1,054.19 CDN in fuel for this Mazda. Mind you, I haven\'t driven it that many km\'s to begin with. I believe my odometer is at 14,000 km.

    Cheers,

    PiCASSO
    Can you make this spreadsheet available for us? I find it very useful.

  13. #163
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    178
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Replying to Topic \'Fuel Economy\'

    Originally posted by Optimzer


    wow that\'s detailed - being an engineer...I like!!

    just a thought - I\'m not sure how you do your average b/c I don\'t have your spreadsheet file...but I\'m assuming that you\'re taking the average of each of your economy readings. However, as majic posted earlier, to get a more accurate posting, that doesn\'t give you the most accurate figure (you\'re taking an average of averages).

    Try calculating the average by summing up all the litres of fuel you\'ve used and dividing by the total number of kilometers driven. This will, if anything, give you a more accurate average...

    ie - (1000L / 14000km) * 100 = 7.14L / 100km

    nice work though.

    just to add to that...your economy does seem pretty crappy. you have quite a few high figures too - do you think those are outliers that aren\'t accurate or something happened? I haven\'t driven enough to speak about mine so I\'m waiting to see how it will turn out...

    but what\'s your driving style? shiftpoints? a/c use? etc...
    To clarify your questions, Optimzer:

    1. It\'s a very simple spreadsheet, which I\'d be happy to upload to you if you like.
    2. For each trip, I reset the \"A\" counter to zero.
    3. Drive for a few days.
    4. I take down the number of kilometers I\'ve travelled using the \"A\" trip reader.
    5. I take down the amount of fuel filled up, to the top. I\'ve stopped trying to round off the cost fo the fuel to the nearest 50-cents or whole dollar, because I end up adding screwing around with the volume of fuel.
    6. I use these two figures to calculate my fuel economy in Litres per 100 kilometers.
    7. I also convert some of the metric units to their respective Imperial units. This is where I calculate both the US and UK gallons and their respective miles to the gallon.
    8. I subtract the 55-litre theoretical full tank from the number of liters I\'ve used. With this amount I determine the amount of distance I can travel on the trip\'s particular fuel economy until the tank is empty. Then I add the original km\'s travelled to the theoretical km\'s and get the theoretical range of driving the Mazda till it\'s empty.
    9. The only average that I have is calculated at the bottom, using Excel\'s AVERAGE(x,y) function. Nothing special, but it gives you an overall feel of how I\'m doing.
    10. Driving habits vary. I will admit that I got a suprising 8.709 L/100km when driving from Toronto to Niagara Falls at 130-150 km/h. I expected nothing less than 10 L/100km with that high spirited driving.
    11. So I think the real variable in these calculations is the GAS stations. I\'m sure that if I decided to check just how much fuel they really pump out, there will be some significant discrepancies. Mind you, that the amount of fuel pumped in the summer will be different in the winter, because of temperature difference. So the flow rates will change. I think it comes down to monthly calibration at each station to ensure that all consumers are infact paying the exact amount of money as claimed by the station. But to enforce that for the consumer level will probably rise the prices of fuel by a few cents, thus pissing off the consumers in the end.
    12. My foot is usually heavy, with shift points around 3.5 to 4.5k revs.
    13. Just imagine driving the base Mazda 6 with the 2.3L engine. It weighs plenty more, and I wouldn\'t be surprised if the figures are WORSE than the 3.0L V6.

    Hope that answers your questions,

    PiCASSO

  14. #164
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    178
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Replying to Topic \'Fuel Economy\'

    Originally posted by majic


    Originally posted by Optimzer


    wow that\'s detailed - being an engineer...I like!!
    just to rehash:

    if ( mood == pissed off || ricer_revving == true || onramp_ahead == true){
    shift(5000, 6750);
    }else{
    shift(2000, 3000);
    }

    if (temp == unbearable && (speed > 60 || rain == true)){
    AC = ON;
    windows = UP;
    }else{
    AC = OFF;
    windows = DOWN;
    }

    My geek friend, Majic... when are you going to learn that PASCAL is the way of the programming future? Forget about your C++ (?) language. Or even try COBALT!

    Man, I can\'t remember the last time I programmed anything. But I do remember learning BASIC, C, C++, and PASCAL back in high school and university. Now, I simply let people like you do my dirty work. Hahaha...

    Originally posted by majic

    for the penny pinchers and tree huggers :p after 13898km I spent $958.69 - so 1L/100km difference will save you 100bux over ~14000km (compared to PiCASSO\'s numbers)

    also, i\'ve been keeping my eye on when the light comes on and then how much i can fill and i\'ve averaged 11.53L of \'reserve fuel\'
    I\'ve actually driven 14,990, as of Monday, June 13th. I did some number crunching and I\'m actually 1,000 behind my lease. So I\'m happy because I was worried that my trips to Windsor and back would accumulate too many kilometers for me to catch up. But I will also admit that giving the car to my sister for various weekends has proved that she hasn\'t kept track of my fuel economy matrix, which would explain why I can\'t account for some 1,500 km (that\'s a lot of driving on my sister\'s part, isn\'t it?). Anyways, almost 8 months I\'ve had this car and spent $1,054 (of my money) to fill her up to drive 13,571 km. With this trend, I will end up spending nearly $1,600 per year in fuel alone (some 2,111 Litres of fuel at $0.760 per litre). Compare that to the figures Government of Canada is advertising in the 2005 MY most fuel efficient cars (vehicles.gc.ca) I\'m trailing the Honda Odyssey EX-L, a good full-size 3.5L 255-HP van, by a good 91 Litres per year (it will consume 2,020 Litres of fuel per year).

    Bottom line:

    You want fuel economy: Drive slow.
    You want fuel economy and drive quick: Buy a Honda.


  15. #165
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    178
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Replying to Topic \'Fuel Economy\'

    Originally posted by maldini


    Originally posted by PiCASSO


    Okay, boys and girls. I tend to be a little anal about documenting my fuel economy in my Mazda3.

    As shown in the chart above, I am averaging the following:

    10.377 L/100km
    22.953 MPG (US)
    27.565 MPG (UK)
    536.697 km (theoretical range till every single 55-litre is used)

    The last entry, June 9th has been my 3rd worst hit. I have to mention that the previous 3-fill ups where at Shell gas stations, and the last one at Sunoco. Maybe the amount of fuel dispensed isn\'t calibrated so Sunoco is off by a few litres, thus giving me the sh*tty 11.826 L/100km (19.889 MPG)figure? I dunno, all I know is that I am a little disappointed in my overall average, which I expecting to drop below 10.0 L/100km.

    Oh yes, in the past 7-months or so, I\'ve also spent $1,054.19 CDN in fuel for this Mazda. Mind you, I haven\'t driven it that many km\'s to begin with. I believe my odometer is at 14,000 km.

    Cheers,

    PiCASSO
    Can you make this spreadsheet available for us? I find it very useful.
    Just send me your e-mail address via Private Message (see that bottom right button that says \"Message\") and I\'ll forward you the Excel file. That goes for anyone, I\'d be more than happy pass it around. But in all honesty, it\'s nothing difficult for anyone with basic math skills to put together. After you get the spreadsheet, take a look at the formula\'s used to determine how everything works.

    Cheers,

    PiCASSO

  16. #166
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    178
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Replying to Topic \'Fuel Economy\'

    Originally posted by majic

    Originally posted by nerdy_grrl_t


    Alright... I\'ve read through most of this thread and I still can\'t tell whether my car gets good/bad mileage... most people seem to be talking about the GT?

    On my 2004 Sport GS the gas light comes on around 400 kms, so I\'d assume I get about 500km per tank? I do about 70% city, 30% highway and nearly the exact same mileage every week... seems to me I should be getting more out of one tank? (The car has 12400 kms on it).

    Also someone suggested changing brands of gas... could that really help?


    Nerdy_Grrl
    with a GS you should be in the 8s.. or at least most of the ppl on TM3 are getting those numbers.. looks like the 2.0L engine is closer to its advertised ratings.
    I have a friend at work with a 5-speed manual 2.0L GS. He\'s pulling anything from 6.5 to 7.5 L/100km. I try not to talk to this friend, as I\'m always in tears when I hear these figures. Then again, he drives on the highway at some 105 km/h. So it\'s funny to see grandma\'s in their Tercel\'s passing him on the right lane.

  17. #167
    Noob
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    12
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Replying to Topic \'Fuel Economy\'

    ROFL Picasso... you guys are too funny... :p

  18. #168
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    63
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Replying to Topic \'Fuel Economy\'


    Hey I get those 6.6L/100km - 7.5L/100km in my 2.3L 5 speed, but I imagine your friend driving at 105 khr would even pass me. As mentioned above, if you want your car to return decent fuel economy slow down! otherwise quit complaining! I find it amusing every April when fuel prices jump and folks who drive without fuel economy in mind or drive unneccary vehicles complain about fuel when they have a way to solve their problem by using their right foot a little differently.

    Chris

    btw... here is my most recent log:
    Date $ L km miles L/100km mpg

    17-May 36.65 44.21 620.3 384.6 7.13 33.00
    23-May 33.81 41.30 587.0 363.9 7.04 33.43
    29-May 37.00 43.58 624.0 386.9 6.98 33.68
    30-May 8.73 11.56 132.0 81.8 8.76 26.86
    6-Jun 38.00 43.73 671.4 416.3 6.51 36.11 WOW!

    tot/avg 1129.7 1417.7 18507.3 7.66 30.70

  19. #169
    Noob
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    21
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Replying to Topic \'Fuel Economy\'


    Bottom line:

    You want fuel economy: Drive slow.
    You want fuel economy and drive quick: Buy a Honda.

    Hahahha.. I have a civic, and it doesn\'t drive quick. ever. and it\'s not as pretty.

    just calculated my first figures..

    12.42L/100km... 100% city.

    2.3 GT AT.

    This is worse than my parent\'s V6 camry... ack.

  20. #170
    Jr Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    412
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Replying to Topic \'Fuel Economy\'

    I get the same numbers as you elevin
    ya the numbers are worst than my dad\'s maxima -_-

  21. #171
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    155
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Replying to Topic \'Fuel Economy\'

    Originally posted by SwooshICE


    I get the same numbers as you elevin
    ya the numbers are worst than my dad\'s maxima -_-
    Wow! I have a \'89 Maxima and man did/does that thing get BAD gas mileage!

  22. #172
    Jr Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    573
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Replying to Topic \'Fuel Economy\'

    I just worked out my long term average (about 1800km) and it works out to 8.8L/100km

  23. #173
    Noob
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    49
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Replying to Topic \'Fuel Economy\'

    another fill up

    2.0L auto, 95% city

    462.5km, 36.708L => 7.94L/100km

  24. #174
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,072
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Replying to Topic \'Fuel Economy\'

    Women drivers.....!

    My wife drives the car during the week and averages around 500-520

    She was in the US for 2 weeks, so i had the car and averaged 430 :p

  25. #175
    Sr Member TheProfessor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    6,499
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Replying to Topic \'Fuel Economy\'

    Wow, you guys are a little nuts about the fuel economy, eh? You guys should just do what I do, fill \'er up, and have fun driving. There\'s nothing you can do about the mileage you\'re getting, unless you want to drive like a granny, and considering you all own a 3 then I can assume you don\'t.

Page 7 of 59 FirstFirst ... 567891757 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •