Originally Posted by
stock3
Trust me I did plenty of research and I have yet to se a STUDY that would prove that engines using synthetic oil run longer than the ones using dino. Oil companies spew a bunch of marketing hype like cleanliness and start-up protection with no back up studies exactly for the reasons so that people "can put two and two together" and make it a fact in their own minds.
Synthetic oils flow better at very low temps, no question about that, but again, I have yet to see a study, with teardowns and measurements that would prove that better flow equals less wear. In fact at -40C even the thinnest synthetics are hundreds of times heavier than the operating temp requirement, heck even in the middle of summer at the hottest day the oil is multiple times heavier than at operating temp, that's why all oils have this little thing called anti-wear additives that provide boundary lubrication during those cold starts. The thinner oil will, however, reach operating temp faster, therefore reducing the time the engine is under boundary lubrication. That in theory should reduce wear and it probably does, but I don't think it's statistically significant to engine life, as I have'nt seen the hard numbers yet. Of course you can provide those if you have them.
One last thing, the main purpose for synthetic oil is extended drain intervals, and higher flash point for applications that push the oil temperature into stratosphere. Stop reading marketing claims made during commercials or printed on oil bottles.